One Nation One Election Violates the Basic Structure of Constitution & I’ll Go to Supreme Court

1 month ago 28

One of the founding members of the Association for Democratic Reforms, a highly regarded body that monitors the performance of India’s democracy and elections, has said that he has no doubt that one nation one election will breach the federal structure of the Indian constitution and, therefore, on that basis, it will violate the basic structure of the constitution. Prof. Jagdeep Chhokar adds that he will personally raise the issue with the Supreme Court and he is confident he will win the case. In a 25-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Prof. Chhokar, a former Professor and Dean at the Indian Institute of Management in Ahmedabad, said he not only disagrees with Prime Minister Modi’s claim that one nation one policy will make India’s democracy “more vibrant and participative” but, he added, the opposite is the truth. It will make India’s democracy less participative and less vibrant. In the interview, Prof. Chhokar strenuously and in detail disagreed with the two main reasons why proponents of one nation one election support the concept. First, he said, quoting former CEC S. Y. Quraishi, that the Election Commission spends around 4,500 crore on national elections and they do not cost the 30,000 crore claimed by the Prime Minister and cited by Prof. Chhokar in his essay of 2018 on this subject. Secondly, he pointed out India should not be looking for the least expensive election but for the most effective one. To judge an election in terms of its cost is wrong. Secondly, Prof. Chhokar strongly disagreed with the claim that the model code of conduct holds up development and delays governance. He said this can only be said by those who have not read the model code of conduct. He specifically said that the MCC permits all existing development schemes to continue. It permits new development schemes that do not impinge on the elections to be started and, third, even new schemes that would impact the elections can be initiated with permission from the Election Commission. I will stop there. I am only giving you the big main points made by Prof. Chhokar. There’s a lot that he has said that I am leaving you to hear when you watch the interview. He has spoken forcefully but also with enormous analytical detail. His is a very powerful voice. To help you I will give you the list of questions. Here they are: 1) I want to focus this interview on the desirability of one nation one election. The Prime Minister has claimed that it will make India’s democracy “more vibrant and participative”. How do you respond to that statement? 2) Let’s first look at the reasons why people advocate one nation one election. Basically there are two. First, there’s no doubt that elections every five years is a lot cheaper than multiple elections at different times. But in an essay you did in 2018 you say the Prime Minister has claimed that political parties alone spend 30,000 crore in a national election. You believe this is a hugely exaggerated figure. Can you explain why? 3) In this connection, Shashi Tharoor and Praveen Chakravarty have calculated that one nation one election would only save less than 5,000 crore a year. For an economy of India’s size, of 326 lakh crore according to the budget estimate, which makes it the fifth largest economy in the world, is this a determining factor or just a small concern? 4) A second reason why people support one nation one election is that the restrictions of the model code of conduct will only apply for a limited period thus permitting politicians to devote themselves to governance. But in your essay you argue the model code of conduct does not hold up governance. Can you explain why you have come to that conclusion? 5) The other point is that the model code of conduct only applies nationwide when there is a national election. Surely at state level it’s only a minor concern. Would you agree? 6) So, to sum up about the two main reasons why people propose one nation one election, would you agree that elections should not be judged by their cost nor by the conduct required for their fair implementation? 7) Let’s now come to the arguments against one nation one election. First, does it contradict the character of our country? We are not one nation one religion or one nation one language or one nation one culture. We are a Union of States where our differences constitute our richness. They make us special and significant. Does one nation one election detract from that? Join The Wire's Youtube Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChWtJey46brNr7qHQpN6KLQ/join

The Vision and Mission of Upilink News - Empowering Informed Citizens

Welcome to Upilink News, your gateway to unbiased news, investigative journalism, and a platform free from government censorship. At Upilink, we believe in the power of information to empower citizens, fostering a well-informed society capable of making informed decisions.

Our platform, hosted at www.news.upilink.in, is meticulously curated to provide users with a reliable source of news, steering clear of propaganda and ensuring the delivery of objective reporting.

The Need for Upilink News

In an era where information is abundant but often tainted with bias and misinformation, the need for a trustworthy news source has never been more critical. Upilink News recognizes this necessity and strives to fill the gap by offering a carefully curated selection of news from diverse, reputable sources.

Our commitment to unbiased reporting and investigative journalism distinguishes us as a beacon of truth in the digital news landscape.

Our Unique Approach

What sets Upilink News apart is our meticulous selection process for news sources.

We prioritize transparency, accountability, and reliability in our curation, ensuring that only the most credible and unbiased reports make it to our platform.

Our team of experienced journalists and fact-checkers work tirelessly to sift through the noise and present users with news that stands up to scrutiny.

The Role of Investigative Journalism

Investigative journalism is at the heart of Upilink News. We understand that a well-functioning democracy relies on an informed citizenry, and investigative reporting plays a pivotal role in uncovering the truth. By supporting and promoting investigative journalism, we aim to contribute to a more transparent and accountable society.

Sustaining Upilink News - Your Support Matters

Free Access for All

At Upilink News, we firmly believe that access to information should be a fundamental right for everyone. Therefore, our platform is entirely free to use, allowing users from all walks of life to stay informed without any financial barrier.

Donations - Fueling Independent Journalism

To sustain our commitment to unbiased reporting and investigative journalism, we rely on the generosity of our users. Your donations go directly towards supporting our team, maintaining our infrastructure, and enabling us to continually improve and expand our coverage.

By contributing, you become a vital part of the Upilink community, driving the mission to keep information free and accessible.

Advertisement - Balancing Sustainability

In addition to donations, we embrace advertisements as a means of generating revenue to support Upilink News.

In conclusion, Upilink News is more than just a news aggregator; it's a commitment to empowering citizens through unbiased information.

Join us in our mission, explore the diverse and credible news on our platform, and consider supporting us through donations. Together, let's build a community that values truth, transparency, and the power of an informed citizenry.