Justice Chandrachud’s Term as CJI Riddled With Serious Mistakes Says Justice Madan B. Lokur

1 month ago 19

Justice Chandrachud’s term as CJI was riddled with ‘serious mistakes’: Justice Madan Lokur, former judge of the Supreme Court and presently a judge of the Supreme Court of Fiji, to Karan Thapar for The Wire. One of the most highly regarded former judges of the Indian Supreme Court, who is presently a judge of the Supreme Court of Fiji, has said Justice Chandrachud’s two year term as the Chief Justice of India was riddled with “serious mistakes”. Justice Madan Lokur identified six or possibly seven, which ranged across Justice Chandrachud’s judgements as Chief Justice, his performance on the administrative side as well as the things he said and did as Chief Justice of India. When it was put to him that his assessment of Justice Chandrachud’s term as CJI suggested that it was riddled with mistakes, Justice Lokur readily and fully agreed. Rather than go into extensive details, I would prefer you to see the interview and hear Justice Lokur and his analysis and assessment of Justice Chandrachud for yourself. However, let me give you a few brief pointers. Of the judgements which contained “serious mistakes”, Justice Lokur mentioned the Article 370 judgement, which also covered the demotion of Jammu and Kashmir from a state to a union territory, the electoral bond judgement, the failure to take up the Citizenship Amendment Act and an earlier judgement which we now know Justice Chandrachud authored i.e. the Ayodhya Judgement. In each case Justice Lokur identified critical areas where necessary and required follow up action and decisions were not taken and the failure to take them, he said, amounts to a “serious mistake”. You can get details from watching the interview. Justice Lokur said the failure to take the required and necessary follow up decision and actions – and there are several instances where this happened – meant Justice Chandrachud “failed to do his full duty”. Justice Lokur also spoke at length about Justice Chandrachud’s performance on the administrative side. He spoke about how as Master of the Roster cases were allocated to particular benches, how as Head of the Registry cases were not being listed or wrongly listed or sometimes taken away arbitrarily without explanation (in this instance, he spoke at length about the Collegium matter that was taken away from Justice Sanjay Kaul). He also spoke about how as Head of the Judiciary Justice Chandrachud did not always take chief justices into confidence. Asked if Justice Lokur was disappointed with Justice Chandrachud’s performance on the administrative side, Justice Lokur said “he disappointed definitely.” Justice Lokur also spoke about how bail has repeatedly been denied to people like Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and the Bhima Koregaon accused. He spoke about how necessary follow up action against the election officer in the Chandigarh case and in the Shinde-Fadnavis-Ajit Pawar government case was not taken. Justice Lokur spoke critically about the number of lectures and interviews Justice Chandrachud has given, adding that it has set an unfortunate precedent that could lead to consequences that would “not be good” if High Court Chief Justices now start giving interivews. In a similar vein, Justice Lokur spoke about the Chief Justice inviting the Prime Minister to his home for Aarti or claiming that God has given him the solution to the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhumi dispute. I will stop there. Justice Lokur has been candid and forthright in his assessment and his comments about Justice Chandrachud and I think it’s only fair that he should be allowed to speak for himself. I do not want to run the risk of misconstruing or wrongly emphasizing what he said through a paraphrase or precis. What I will add is that I don’t think I have come across any other former highly respected Supreme Court judge commenting so frankly and outspokenly about the tenure of a just-retired Chief Justice. Before he became a judge of the Supreme Court, Justice Lokur was chief justice of the Gauhati High Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Earlier he was a judge of the Delhi High Court. He has also served as Additional Solicitor General. Join The Wire's Youtube Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChWtJey46brNr7qHQpN6KLQ/join

The Vision and Mission of Upilink News - Empowering Informed Citizens

Welcome to Upilink News, your gateway to unbiased news, investigative journalism, and a platform free from government censorship. At Upilink, we believe in the power of information to empower citizens, fostering a well-informed society capable of making informed decisions.

Our platform, hosted at www.news.upilink.in, is meticulously curated to provide users with a reliable source of news, steering clear of propaganda and ensuring the delivery of objective reporting.

The Need for Upilink News

In an era where information is abundant but often tainted with bias and misinformation, the need for a trustworthy news source has never been more critical. Upilink News recognizes this necessity and strives to fill the gap by offering a carefully curated selection of news from diverse, reputable sources.

Our commitment to unbiased reporting and investigative journalism distinguishes us as a beacon of truth in the digital news landscape.

Our Unique Approach

What sets Upilink News apart is our meticulous selection process for news sources.

We prioritize transparency, accountability, and reliability in our curation, ensuring that only the most credible and unbiased reports make it to our platform.

Our team of experienced journalists and fact-checkers work tirelessly to sift through the noise and present users with news that stands up to scrutiny.

The Role of Investigative Journalism

Investigative journalism is at the heart of Upilink News. We understand that a well-functioning democracy relies on an informed citizenry, and investigative reporting plays a pivotal role in uncovering the truth. By supporting and promoting investigative journalism, we aim to contribute to a more transparent and accountable society.

Sustaining Upilink News - Your Support Matters

Free Access for All

At Upilink News, we firmly believe that access to information should be a fundamental right for everyone. Therefore, our platform is entirely free to use, allowing users from all walks of life to stay informed without any financial barrier.

Donations - Fueling Independent Journalism

To sustain our commitment to unbiased reporting and investigative journalism, we rely on the generosity of our users. Your donations go directly towards supporting our team, maintaining our infrastructure, and enabling us to continually improve and expand our coverage.

By contributing, you become a vital part of the Upilink community, driving the mission to keep information free and accessible.

Advertisement - Balancing Sustainability

In addition to donations, we embrace advertisements as a means of generating revenue to support Upilink News.

In conclusion, Upilink News is more than just a news aggregator; it's a commitment to empowering citizens through unbiased information.

Join us in our mission, explore the diverse and credible news on our platform, and consider supporting us through donations. Together, let's build a community that values truth, transparency, and the power of an informed citizenry.